Muslim Brotherhood gradualism

Names and abbreviations on this page

US — United States. US$ denotes United States dollars.

CFR — Council on Foreign Relations. An independent policy organisation and publisher; here the abbreviation identifies a source.

Overview

The founding in Egypt, 1928–1949

In 1928, the schoolteacher Hasan al-Banna established the Society of Muslim Brothers in Ismailia, a city beside the Suez Canal. Egypt was formally independent after 1922, but British military and political influence remained substantial. Al-Banna argued that social weakness and foreign domination could be addressed through religious education, personal discipline and the rebuilding of communal institutions. His followers organized study circles, schools, charitable assistance and local branches. By the 1930s and 1940s, the movement was also taking positions on colonial rule, Palestine and the place of Islamic law in public affairs. Its growth was not purely peaceful: a clandestine armed apparatus emerged, and members were implicated in political violence. Prime Minister Mahmoud al-Nuqrashi was assassinated in December 1948 by a Brotherhood member. Al-Banna was killed in February 1949, amid the ensuing confrontation with the state.

The meaning and limits of gradualism

Gradualism, in this setting, meant changing public life over time by educating adherents, delivering services, organizing professional and neighborhood networks, and eventually seeking political influence. It differed from the claim that an immediate armed seizure of power was the only route to change. Yet it was not a single doctrine followed consistently by every leader or branch. A movement may participate in elections while still facing difficult questions about equal citizenship, the independence of courts, religious freedom, women’s rights and the authority of elected institutions. Its public commitments and actual conduct must be examined in each period.

Supporting references: [1]

Organizations and supporting institutions

Revolution, repression and competing strategies, 1952–1970

The Brotherhood initially welcomed the July 1952 overthrow of King Farouk by Egypt’s Free Officers, but its relationship with the new rulers deteriorated. Gamal Abdel Nasser’s government suppressed the organization after an attempt on his life in 1954, which the authorities attributed to a Brotherhood member. Thousands were detained. Hasan al-Hudaybi, the Brotherhood’s second general guide, defended a more restrained approach, while the imprisoned writer Sayyid Qutb developed a far more confrontational critique of existing Muslim governments. Qutb was executed in 1966. His writings later influenced radical militants, although the Brotherhood’s organizational mainstream did not uniformly adopt those militants’ methods.

Social work and elections, 1970–2011

Under President Anwar al-Sadat in the 1970s, Brotherhood members regained some room for religious and social activity. During Hosni Mubarak’s presidency, beginning in 1981, the organization remained officially prohibited but built influence through professional associations, charitable activity and candidates running as independents or in alliances. In the 2005 parliamentary election, Brotherhood-affiliated independents won 88 seats. These networks provided services where public institutions were strained, but they also became instruments of recruitment and political organization. The distinction matters: receiving help from a clinic or charity does not by itself establish political membership or agreement with an organization’s program.

The presidency and its collapse, 2011–2013

Mass protests ended Mubarak’s presidency in February 2011. The Brotherhood formed the Freedom and Justice Party, and its candidate Mohamed Morsi won Egypt’s 2012 presidential election. His administration faced severe economic pressures, institutional conflict and public opposition. A disputed constitutional declaration in November 2012 expanded presidential authority and intensified fears among opponents about checks and balances. After enormous demonstrations, the military led by Abdel Fattah el-Sisi removed Morsi on July 3, 2013. Security forces violently dispersed pro-Morsi sit-ins that August, killing hundreds. The government subsequently banned the Brotherhood and imprisoned large numbers of its members. The sequence demonstrates both the possibilities and fragility of electoral participation where the armed forces, courts and elected government contest political authority.

Supporting references: [1]

Western relevance and limits

Different paths beyond Egypt

The Egyptian organization inspired movements elsewhere, but national branches developed under different laws and political pressures. In Jordan, Brotherhood-linked figures participated in parliamentary life through the Islamic Action Front. In Syria, a violent confrontation between Islamist insurgents and the government culminated in the devastating 1982 assault on Hama under President Hafez al-Assad. In Tunisia, Rached Ghannouchi and other founders of the movement that became Ennahda drew on some Brotherhood ideas but later pursued their own political compromises. Following the 2011 Tunisian revolution, Ennahda joined coalition politics and, in 2016, announced a distinction between party politics and religious preaching. These differences make a single description of all Islamist movements historically inaccurate.

Migration, European institutions and public debate

Political repression and migration brought Brotherhood-associated thinkers and activists to Europe from the mid-twentieth century onward. Some established religious, educational and community institutions; others joined existing Muslim civic organizations. Research published by the Pew Research Center in 2010 traced intellectual and organizational influences, while also distinguishing generations and national settings. A shared speaker, historical text or religious vocabulary is not proof that a present-day organization is directed by the Egyptian Brotherhood. Claims of formal affiliation, financial support or control require identifiable records and evidence.

Consequences for contemporary society

The Brotherhood’s history raises practical questions for societies well beyond Egypt. Public welfare can expand access to education and health services, yet services tied to partisan loyalties may also raise questions about inclusion. Electoral participation can bring previously excluded groups into public institutions, while constitutional disputes can expose weaknesses in protections for opponents and minorities. State crackdowns can destroy civil liberties and push political disputes outside lawful channels. In each case, the relevant evidence is specific: who held authority, which law applied, what the institution did, who benefited, and whose rights were restricted.

Supporting references: [2]

Key distinction

Recent United States designations and their scope

On January 13, 2026, the United States announced terrorism-related designations targeting specific Muslim Brotherhood branches: the Treasury Department designated the Egyptian and Jordanian branches as Specially Designated Global Terrorists, while the State Department designated the Lebanese branch as a Foreign Terrorist Organization and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist. The legal consequences depend on the precise designation and applicable United States law. These actions do not classify Muslims generally, or every organization influenced by Brotherhood literature, as terrorists.

Questions for examining an organization

A careful historical assessment distinguishes an organization’s stated goals from documented activities. Useful questions include: when was the organization established, who led it, what formal ties existed with other groups, how was it funded, which elections or conflicts did it enter, and what independent evidence establishes its conduct? That approach makes it possible to compare social reform, democratic participation, coercion and violence without treating them as interchangeable.

Supporting references: [3]

Related learning

Jamaat-e-Islami and constitutional Islamism

Ennahda and Muslim democracy

Belief, political ideology & public action

Nonviolence, coercion & violence

External Resources